Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /customers/menza.org/menza.org/httpd.www/wp-settings.php on line 517

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /customers/menza.org/menza.org/httpd.www/wp-settings.php on line 532

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /customers/menza.org/menza.org/httpd.www/wp-settings.php on line 539

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /customers/menza.org/menza.org/httpd.www/wp-settings.php on line 575

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /customers/menza.org/menza.org/httpd.www/wp-includes/cache.php on line 104

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /customers/menza.org/menza.org/httpd.www/wp-includes/query.php on line 62

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /customers/menza.org/menza.org/httpd.www/wp-includes/theme.php on line 1108
MenZa’s Weblog » 2007 » February

Archive for February, 2007

Tynonym?

I happened to stumble over Wordhacker’s blog today, and read the most awesome article I’ve read in a long time. It’s basically about tynonyms (or t9onyms), you know whenever your phone decides to spell out “have” rather than “hate” and “able” rather than “cake” when you use the built-in T9-dictionary?
Wordhacker analyses this phenomenon pretty well, and compiles a decent article about it.

I highly recommend reading it.

I’ve been annoyed about this so often — how about yourself, what is your stance on tynonyms?

There’s a digg submission for his post here — drop a digg :)

2 Comments »

Lasse Havelund on February 21st 2007 in Miscellaneous

SeedSpill GrassCampus